Friday, December 11, 2009

A controversy is brewing regarding the health effects of new high-tech carbon nanotubes. These products are already in use in industries as wide ranging as high-end bicycle frame construction to electronics to medical applications.

According to studies by the Centers for Disease Control and US EPA, the answer may be yes. While this is a hot area of research and corporate growth, preventing another massive, quiet epidemic of cancer is worth the wait.

See also:

1. Centers for Disease Control: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/blog/nsb052008_nano.html
2. Nanotech Firms Fear New EPA Regs:

http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/nanotech-firms-fear-new-epa-regs.html

Monday, November 16, 2009

Outside dust can be dangerous

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120252957

This excellent short piece summarizes a little know serious health risk -- dust from toxic release can follow persons into their home and remain for decades.

Here is the link to the abstract on Dr. Beamer's recent article on this factor:

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es9003735

and more links to this issue.

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=107488
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/age-old-mystery-of-household-dust-solved_100267067.html

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Flavored Cigarette Ban: A Move in the Right Direction

Obama's administration has finally banned flavored cigarettes and is on target for more restrictions on cigarette smoking. Each of the new restrictions is designed to reduce the impact of smoking on children and teenagers, including stopping sports marketing and increasing warnings on packs.

For more, read:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/health/policy/23fda.html

http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/FlavoredTobacco/default.htm

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Anti-Asbestos Rally in Washington, DC July 1, 2009

Friends,
Please join your colleagues in the labor and public health community in front of the Canadian Embassy on July 1 (Canada Day) at 12:00 NOON in Washington, DC for a rally to shame the Canada government for exporting asbestos to the developing world. (See the recent CBC report 'Canada's Ugly Secret' profiling asbestos disease among workers in Gujarat, India. http://www.cbc.ca/national/blog/video/healtheducation/canadas_ugly_secret.html )
The Canadian government is particularly sensitive to US media coverage and it would be GREAT to get a substantial group of us rallying in front of their embassy. We are working to get Mellissa Fung, the CBC journalist who did the above piece, to cover the rally. We intentionally set the time at 12:00 Noon in hopes you can work this into your lunch time break. The Canadian Embassy is on Constitution Ave NW near 6th Street (very close to the DOL building.)
Please share this message with your labor and public health colleagues, and try to work this event into your schedule on Wed, July 1st.
Celeste Monforton, MPH, DrPH
APHA OHS Section Chair
Celeste Monforton, MPH, DrPHAssistant Research ProfessorDept of Environ & Occup HealthSchool of Public Health & Health Services The George Washington University 2100 M Street NW, Ste 203Washington, DC 20037202-994-0774 (phone)202-994-2102 (fax)celeste.monforton@gwumc.eduwww.DefendingScience.orgBlog: The Pump Handle

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

New asbestos symposium stirs the pot, but offers no solutions


The Southwestern Law School recently sponsored a symposium on asbestos litigation. Unfortunately, most of the articles published are a screed for a handful of insurance carriers and defense litigators seeking to end the litigation and keep the victims of asbestos poisoning from getting their day in court. Here is the link, but caveat emptor. Note: One particularly misleading set of articles was funded by the "Coalition for Litigation Justices, Inc." This is a group funded by the tobacco industry and asbestos defense lobbyists and their concept of "justice" means that injured people cannot sue them for wrongdoing:

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2009/02/the-southwester.html

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Widow beats Phillip Morris in landmark tobacco verdict


Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Chemical Company held liable in mesothelioma workers' injury case

The team of Carolin Shining of Paul and Hanley LLP and Simona Farise of the Farise Law Firm were successful in obtaining a verdict in excess of $9 million against Union Carbide Corporation. The case involved a terminal and incurable asbestos cancer suffered by a lifetime plumber who was present when drywall muds containing Union Carbide's Calidria fiber were sanded and released into the air. The award included a first-ever finding of punitive damages against Union Carbide of $6 million dollars.

See the following link for more information:

http://www.farriselaw.com/Verdicts-112508.html

Third Hand Smoke? What is it and what are the Risks?

Just posted today on Sciam.com, scientific american's website. Another altruistic reason to quit smoking?

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-third-hand-smoke

What is third-hand smoke? Is it hazardous?
Researchers warn cigarette dangers may be even more far-reaching
By Coco Ballantyne

Here is an excerpt:

"Ever take a whiff of a smoker's hair and feel faint from the pungent scent of cigarette smoke? Or perhaps you have stepped into an elevator and wondered why it smells like someone has lit up when there is not a smoker in sight. Welcome to the world of third-hand smoke."Third-hand smoke is tobacco smoke contamination that remains after the cigarette has been extinguished," says Jonathan Winickoff, a pediatrician at the Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center in Boston and author of a study on the new phenomenon published in the journal Pediatrics. According to the study, a large number of people, particularly smokers, have no idea that third-hand smoke—the cocktail of toxins that linger in carpets, sofas, clothes and other materials hours or even days after a cigarette is put out—is a health hazard for infants and children.

Of the 1,500 smokers and nonsmokers Winickoff surveyed, the vast majority agreed that second-hand smoke is dangerous. But when asked whether they agreed with the statement, "Breathing air in a room today where people smoked yesterday can harm the health of infants and children," only 65 percent of nonsmokers and 43 percent of smokers answered "yes.""Third-hand smoke," a term coined by Winickoff's research team, is a relatively new concept but one that has worried researchers and nonsmokers for several years. "The third-hand smoke idea—concern over that—has been around for a long time. It's only recently been given a name and studied," says Stanton Glantz, director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco. "The level of toxicity in cigarette smoke is just astronomical when compared to other environmental toxins [such as particles found in automobile exhaust]," he adds, but notes that he is not aware of any studies directly linking third-hand smoke to disease [as opposed to second-hand smoke, which has been associated with disease].

ScientificAmerican.com asked Winickoff to explain exactly what third-hand smoke is and why it poses a public health risk. How exactly do you distinguish between second- and third- hand smoke? Third-hand smoke refers to the tobacco toxins that build up over time—one cigarette will coat the surface of a certain room [a second cigarette will add another coat, and so on]. The third-hand smoke is the stuff that remains [after visible or "second-hand smoke" has dissipated from the air]…. You can't really quantify it, because it depends on the space…. In a tiny space like a car the deposition is really heavy…. Smokers [may] smoke in another room or turn on a fan. They don't see the smoke going into a child's nose; they think that if they cannot see it, it's not affecting [their children].Smokers themselves are also contaminated…smokers actually emit toxins [from clothing and hair].Why is third-hand smoke dangerous?The 2006 surgeon general's report says there is no risk-free level of tobacco exposure…. There are 250 poisonous toxins found in cigarette smoke. One such substance is lead. Very good studies show that tiny levels of exposure are associated with diminished IQ.What do you consider the most dangerous compound in cigarette smoke?I would say cyanide, which is used in chemical weapons. It actually interferes with the release of oxygen to tissues. It competitively binds to hemoglobin [meaning it competes with oxygen for binding sites on the blood's oxygen-carrying molecule, hemoglobin]. Basically people with cyanide poison turn blue…. [And] arsenic, that is a poison used to kill mammals. We [used to] use it to kill rats. And there it is in cigarette smoke.

Why are the risks associated with exposure to third-hand smoke different for children and adults?The developing brain is uniquely susceptible to extremely low levels of toxins. Remember how we talked about the layers of toxin deposits on surfaces? Who gets exposure to those surfaces? Babies and children are closer to [surfaces such as floors]. They tend to touch or even mouth [put their mouths to] the contaminated surfaces. Imagine a teething infant.Children ingest twice the amount of dust that grown-ups do. Let's say a grown-up weighs 150 pounds [68 kilograms]. Let's say a baby weighs 15 pounds [seven kilograms]. The infant ingests twice the dust [due to faster respiration and proximity to dusty surfaces]. Effectively, they'll get 20 times the exposure.Studies in rats suggest that tobacco toxin exposure is the leading cause of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). We think it is [caused by] respiratory suppression.What types of places or materials harbor the greatest amount of third-hand smoke?Anywhere you see an enclosed space you should watch out for [it].By introducing the phrase "third-hand smoke" in your research, what do you hope to accomplish?

This study points to the need for every smoker to try to quit. That's the only way to completely protect their children….